Editing Turnover to Shadow Cabinet

It's great we officially have a small shadow cabinet.  However, their appointment is productively untimely.  Their appointment perhaps should have been 6 months AGO or 2 months FROM now. 

I propose ONE of the two paths forward.

1. ''Stay the course.'' New ministers are invited to chime in and their input is considered with a degree of priority, but the  election committee finishes, then approve a final EXTERNAL version of the document.  Then, the ministers are assigned to write & improve the INTERNAL version of their respective plank. That is, mainly the guidance for candidates and additional supporting facts, definitions, etc.

2. ''Invite the Ministers'' to "take-over" each plank and the work spent to date.   I don't like this idea, because we'll end up with a final product that will look like it was written by 20 different people.  We'll have different writing styles, and approaches, some people ramble, others don't.  I predict this option taking longer, and more resources.  

--[[User:JNMcLarty|Jeffrey McLarty]] 23:56, 21 November 2012 (EST)

Agreed--[[User:Allen Small|Allen Small]] 17:58, 22 November 2012 (EST)