Talk:Full Slate Money Bomb - Revision history

LibertarianCFO: /* Executive Sponsor / Single Point of Contact */ Added update - Allen Small is it

2012-07-26T14:34:45Z

Executive Sponsor / Single Point of Contact: Added update - Allen Small is it

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 26 July 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	GJ Hagenaars: Suppose JS and I talk to Rob and figure out the amount of effort that needs to go into this, and we figure out who can be the EC liaison after that.		GJ Hagenaars: Suppose JS and I talk to Rob and figure out the amount of effort that needs to go into this, and we figure out who can be the EC liaison after that.

			'''Update as of July 23/12 Executive Meeting'''<br>
			It appears that Allen Small has taken on the responsibility for this project. Jean-Serge and GJ spoke with Rob. He does not want primary responsibility for execution, but is willing to help. Allen will ask for his input before sending out emails and letters. --[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 10:34, 26 July 2012 (EDT)

	= Phase 1 Plan=		= Phase 1 Plan=

LibertarianCFO: /* Letter to Members: (6) */ Add Paolo's email re follow up phone calls

2012-07-26T14:27:20Z

Letter to Members: (6): Add Paolo's email re follow up phone calls

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 26 July 2012
Line 27:		Line 27:
	One of our members stuffs our newsletters and return envelopes in envelopes, stamps them and puts them in the mail for $150.		One of our members stuffs our newsletters and return envelopes in envelopes, stamps them and puts them in the mail for $150.
	--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)		--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

			==Telephone Follow Up==
			Darren [Roskam, our candidate in Barrie,] is a professional telemarketer. I just talked to him about Money bomb and if we are looking for someone to call our members and any other numbers we give him he is willing to do it for 10 bucks an hour. He can come up with a great script for this and any other event we give him.

			I know some of us are against paying but I'm willing to pay for half just to see the result. I'm very curious of the outcome.

			''Paolo by email''
			--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 10:27, 26 July 2012 (EDT)

	= Relevant SMS Notes from Executive Meeting of June 25/12 =		= Relevant SMS Notes from Executive Meeting of June 25/12 =
	*[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.		*[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.

LibertarianCFO at 03:08, 26 June 2012

2012-06-26T03:08:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 26 June 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	= Schedule Outline =		= Schedule Outline =
	The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty\|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)		The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty\|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
	The schedule is about 6 weeks from the first of 4 emails and a letter to the final follow up telephone calls. We need to allow time for responses from each communication before initiating the next contact.
			The schedule is about 6 weeks from the first of 4 emails and a letter to the final follow up telephone calls. We need to allow time for responses from each communication before initiating the next contact. --[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:08, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

	= Content Drafts =		= Content Drafts =
Line 19:		Line 20:
	#Total 532 unique email IDs.		#Total 532 unique email IDs.
	I can easily send emails to all of these.		I can easily send emails to all of these.

			Their are 137 names on our mailing list with no email ID.
	--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)		--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
	== Letter to Members: (6) ==		== Letter to Members: (6) ==
	Their are ~~137~~ names on our mailing list with ~~no email ID~~.		Their are 446 names on our mailing list with addresses in Ontario.
	One of our members stuffs our newsletters and return envelopes in envelopes, stamps them and puts them in the mail for $150.		One of our members stuffs our newsletters and return envelopes in envelopes, stamps them and puts them in the mail for $150.
	--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)		--[[User:LibertarianCFO\|Jim McIntosh]] 23:00, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

LibertarianCFO at 03:00, 26 June 2012

2012-06-26T03:00:51Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
-== Relevant SMS Notes from the Meeting ==
+= Content Drafts =
 *[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.
 *[8:46:14 PM] rie: What exactly would it entail, Jeff? I want to help, but this time of year, I am crazy busy with work until Labor Day or so when it starts to slow down a bit.
 *[8:47:54 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Somebody to act, as a single point of contact, a liason, to make sure things like the "target", the "schedule", gathering the mailing list, what goes into each message, these are intricate details.  The liason, would raise any big pictures to the exec, or, where they feel comfortable, handle the executive decisions themselves.
@@ Line 22: / Line 43: @@
 *[8:53:50 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I mentioned before the official part of the meeting started: the fed-cons are in fundraising mode ALL the time.
 *[8:54:18 PM] rie: We only sell what we advertise. Look at successful companies and political parties, they advertise all the time.
 *[8:55:42 PM] GJ Hagenaars: excellent
 *[8:55:48 PM] rie: We may lose people because it can become annoying. But you would be surprised how well it works.
 *[8:56:46 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Repeating the same thing works very well.
 *[8:56:52 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Ask any parent with a 3-year old.
 *[8:57:44 PM] rie: I am more than happy to write copy and work with Rob depending on how much time is involved. LIke I said up until Labor Day, I am really pressed for time. After that, not bad.
 *[8:58:05 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Pick a SINGLE person, to be the point of contact, with Rob.

JNMcLarty: Undo revision 2062 by JNMcLarty (talk)

2012-06-26T01:11:43Z

Undo revision 2062 by JNMcLarty (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 26 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty\|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

			== Relevant SMS Notes from the Meeting ==
	*[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.		*[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.
	*[8:44:58 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...we're getting into the technical details.		*[8:44:58 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...we're getting into the technical details.

JNMcLarty at 01:09, 26 June 2012

2012-06-26T01:09:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 26 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty\|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)~~		*[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.
			*[8:44:58 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...we're getting into the technical details.
	~~== Relevant SMS Notes from the Meeting ==~~		*[8:45:23 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...getting into the weeds, with 6 people on this call, like the dollar amount...blah
	[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.		*[8:46:14 PM] rie: What exactly would it entail, Jeff? I want to help, but this time of year, I am crazy busy with work until Labor Day or so when it starts to slow down a bit.
	[8:44:58 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...we're getting into the technical details.		*[8:47:54 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Somebody to act, as a single point of contact, a liason, to make sure things like the "target", the "schedule", gathering the mailing list, what goes into each message, these are intricate details. The liason, would raise any big pictures to the exec, or, where they feel comfortable, handle the executive decisions themselves.
	[8:45:23 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...getting into the weeds, with 6 people on this call, like the dollar amount...blah		*[8:49:56 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: We can't possibly, discuss every pro and con, of every feature, and every decision, of this project. It needs a project manager.
	[8:46:14 PM] rie: What exactly would it entail, Jeff? I want to help, but this time of year, I am crazy busy with work until Labor Day or so when it starts to slow down a bit.		*[8:50:42 PM] Jim McIntosh: Jeff - Are you the logical person to manage this project? - the single point of contact?
	[8:47:54 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Somebody to act, as a single point of contact, a liason, to make sure things like the "target", the "schedule", gathering the mailing list, what goes into each message, these are intricate details. The liason, would raise any big pictures to the exec, or, where they feel comfortable, handle the executive decisions themselves.		*[8:51:13 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I suppose I am the logical person - but resource loading wise, something else would have to slip - if I take this on.
	[8:49:56 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: We can't possibly, discuss every pro and con, of every feature, and every decision, of this project. It needs a project manager.		*[8:51:18 PM] rie: I know. Personally, I think we are making it more difficult than we should. Essentially if it is just writing copy and sending out e-mails, I can do that.
	[8:50:42 PM] Jim McIntosh: Jeff - Are you the logical person to manage this project? - the single point of contact?		*[8:51:49 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: To be done right, it needs more though than that.
	[8:51:13 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I suppose I am the logical person - but resource loading wise, something else would have to slip - if I take this on.		*[8:51:53 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Perhaps I can propose something
	[8:51:18 PM] rie: I know. Personally, I think we are making it more difficult than we should. Essentially if it is just writing copy and sending out e-mails, I can do that.		[8:51:55 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: thought.
	[8:51:49 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: To be done right, it needs more though than that.		*[8:52:15 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I'm already behind, on the quiz cards, and the platform re-write.
	[8:51:53 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Perhaps I can propose something		*[8:52:19 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Suppose JS and I talk to Rob and figure out the amount of effort that needs to go into this, and we figure out who can be the EC liaison after that.
	[8:51:55 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: *thought.		*[8:52:42 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...and I've got about 6, half hour phone calls to make, for recruiting purposes - I'm trying to schedule in.
	[8:52:15 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I'm already behind, on the quiz cards, and the platform re-write.		*[8:52:53 PM] rie: I really feel that we should sent e-mail blasts often. I know you guys disagree, but the more they see our e-mails, the better. I write copy every week with new specials, products and incentives for clients. We do get people saying to take them off the list, but then we get people calling us up to buy. It is cheap and effective.
	[8:52:19 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Suppose JS and I talk to Rob and figure out the amount of effort that needs to go into this, and we figure out who can be the EC liaison after that.		[8:53:12 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: phone call/in person meetings. (Sudbury, Waterloo, Cambridge)
	[8:52:42 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...and I've got about 6, half hour phone calls to make, for recruiting purposes - I'm trying to schedule in.		*[8:53:13 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I agree with the increased frequency, Adam.
	[8:52:53 PM] rie: I really feel that we should sent e-mail blasts often. I know you guys disagree, but the more they see our e-mails, the better. I write copy every week with new specials, products and incentives for clients. We do get people saying to take them off the list, but then we get people calling us up to buy. It is cheap and effective.		*[8:53:50 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I mentioned before the official part of the meeting started: the fed-cons are in fundraising mode ALL the time.
	[8:53:12 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: *phone call/in person meetings. (Sudbury, Waterloo, Cambridge)		*[8:54:18 PM] rie: We only sell what we advertise. Look at successful companies and political parties, they advertise all the time.
	[8:53:13 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I agree with the increased frequency, Adam.		*[8:55:29 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Good idea Jim!
	[8:53:50 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I mentioned before the official part of the meeting started: the fed-cons are in fundraising mode ALL the time.		*[8:55:42 PM] GJ Hagenaars: excellent
	[8:54:18 PM] rie: We only sell what we advertise. Look at successful companies and political parties, they advertise all the time.		*[8:55:48 PM] rie: We may lose people because it can become annoying. But you would be surprised how well it works.
	[8:55:29 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Good idea Jim!		*[8:56:46 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Repeating the same thing works very well.
	[8:55:42 PM] GJ Hagenaars: excellent		*[8:56:52 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Ask any parent with a 3-year old.
	[8:55:48 PM] rie: We may lose people because it can become annoying. But you would be surprised how well it works.		*[8:57:04 PM] Matt Belanger: Jim: Can you post the link to the discussion page in here?
	[8:56:46 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Repeating the same thing works very well.		*[8:57:16 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Matt, just look at the recent change list
	[8:56:52 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Ask any parent with a 3-year old.		*[8:57:39 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...as soon as the page is made, it will show up there.
	[8:57:04 PM] Matt Belanger: Jim: Can you post the link to the discussion page in here?		*[8:57:44 PM] rie: I am more than happy to write copy and work with Rob depending on how much time is involved. LIke I said up until Labor Day, I am really pressed for time. After that, not bad.
	[8:57:16 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Matt, just look at the recent change list		*[8:58:05 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Pick a SINGLE person, to be the point of contact, with Rob.
	[8:57:39 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...as soon as the page is made, it will show up there.
	[8:57:44 PM] rie: I am more than happy to write copy and work with Rob depending on how much time is involved. LIke I said up until Labor Day, I am really pressed for time. After that, not bad.
	[8:58:05 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Pick a SINGLE person, to be the point of contact, with Rob.

JNMcLarty at 01:09, 26 June 2012

2012-06-26T01:09:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 26 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.		The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.--[[User:JNMcLarty\|Jeffrey McLarty]] 21:09, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

			== Relevant SMS Notes from the Meeting ==
			[8:44:47 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Let's pick a single person, to represent "The Exec", when working with Rob.
			[8:44:58 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...we're getting into the technical details.
			[8:45:23 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...getting into the weeds, with 6 people on this call, like the dollar amount...blah
			[8:46:14 PM] rie: What exactly would it entail, Jeff? I want to help, but this time of year, I am crazy busy with work until Labor Day or so when it starts to slow down a bit.
			[8:47:54 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Somebody to act, as a single point of contact, a liason, to make sure things like the "target", the "schedule", gathering the mailing list, what goes into each message, these are intricate details. The liason, would raise any big pictures to the exec, or, where they feel comfortable, handle the executive decisions themselves.
			[8:49:56 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: We can't possibly, discuss every pro and con, of every feature, and every decision, of this project. It needs a project manager.
			[8:50:42 PM] Jim McIntosh: Jeff - Are you the logical person to manage this project? - the single point of contact?
			[8:51:13 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I suppose I am the logical person - but resource loading wise, something else would have to slip - if I take this on.
			[8:51:18 PM] rie: I know. Personally, I think we are making it more difficult than we should. Essentially if it is just writing copy and sending out e-mails, I can do that.
			[8:51:49 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: To be done right, it needs more though than that.
			[8:51:53 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Perhaps I can propose something
			[8:51:55 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: *thought.
			[8:52:15 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: I'm already behind, on the quiz cards, and the platform re-write.
			[8:52:19 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Suppose JS and I talk to Rob and figure out the amount of effort that needs to go into this, and we figure out who can be the EC liaison after that.
			[8:52:42 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...and I've got about 6, half hour phone calls to make, for recruiting purposes - I'm trying to schedule in.
			[8:52:53 PM] rie: I really feel that we should sent e-mail blasts often. I know you guys disagree, but the more they see our e-mails, the better. I write copy every week with new specials, products and incentives for clients. We do get people saying to take them off the list, but then we get people calling us up to buy. It is cheap and effective.
			[8:53:12 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: *phone call/in person meetings. (Sudbury, Waterloo, Cambridge)
			[8:53:13 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I agree with the increased frequency, Adam.
			[8:53:50 PM] GJ Hagenaars: I mentioned before the official part of the meeting started: the fed-cons are in fundraising mode ALL the time.
			[8:54:18 PM] rie: We only sell what we advertise. Look at successful companies and political parties, they advertise all the time.
			[8:55:29 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Good idea Jim!
			[8:55:42 PM] GJ Hagenaars: excellent
			[8:55:48 PM] rie: We may lose people because it can become annoying. But you would be surprised how well it works.
			[8:56:46 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Repeating the same thing works very well.
			[8:56:52 PM] GJ Hagenaars: Ask any parent with a 3-year old.
			[8:57:04 PM] Matt Belanger: Jim: Can you post the link to the discussion page in here?
			[8:57:16 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Matt, just look at the recent change list
			[8:57:39 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: ...as soon as the page is made, it will show up there.
			[8:57:44 PM] rie: I am more than happy to write copy and work with Rob depending on how much time is involved. LIke I said up until Labor Day, I am really pressed for time. After that, not bad.
			[8:58:05 PM] Jeffrey McLarty: Pick a SINGLE person, to be the point of contact, with Rob.

JNMcLarty: Created page with "The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out."

2012-06-26T01:07:29Z

Created page with "The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out."

New page

The consensus from the meeting, was that July 1st, is "rushed". And the schedule is a bit drawn out.