Ontario Education Staple: Difference between revisions
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
=Summarizing Language= | =Summarizing Language= | ||
===TWO adjectives, ONE noun=== | ===TWO adjectives, ONE noun=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Simpler superior choice | |||
|Edu-Back-1}} | |||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Innovative, smarter, thorough, comprehensive | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===ONE Catchy Slogan=== | ===ONE Catchy Slogan=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Education is too important to be left to the government. | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===ONE One-sentence quote=== | ===ONE One-sentence quote=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Pubik education failed me completeetly. | |||
* OMG. nuthin is rong w/ public schools. wtf!! | |||
|Edu-Back-1}} | |||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* He who pays the piper calls the tune. | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===ONE Three-sentence quote=== | ===ONE Three-sentence quote=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* "I believe my education was compromised and stiffled, by the current status quo." | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===TWO Charts/Graphs/InfoGraphics=== | ===TWO Charts/Graphs/InfoGraphics=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* SKETCH: Freedom vs Public Education Spending | |||
* SKETCH: Spending up, Quality down. | |||
|Edu-Back-1}} | |||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Increased spending vs output -> see frasier institute. | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===High level bullet Summary=== | ===High level bullet Summary=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Quality... | |||
* Quantity... | |||
* Price... | |||
* Participation... | |||
---- | |||
* Voucher + Market Response + Innovation | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
====Short-term==== | ====Short-term==== | ||
* ... | * ... | ||
| Line 117: | Line 146: | ||
===ONE economic concept=== | ===ONE economic concept=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Competition -> Choice, quality, lower cost. | |||
|Edu-Front-3}} | |||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* People only learn if they want to. | |||
* Pretense of knowledge. | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
===THREE photos=== | ===THREE photos=== | ||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* Ask Christin about the "school textook before and after" photo. | |||
|Edu-Back-1}} | |||
{{CaucusNotes| | |||
* School where $70K missing | |||
* Father stripped searched | |||
* Ryan Comeau | |||
|Edu-Back-2}} | |||
=Guidance For Candidates= | =Guidance For Candidates= | ||
Revision as of 18:02, 3 July 2012
Please add any extra relevant information, to the discussion page. |
Content
Current Problem
|
| Edu-Front-1 |
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
|
| Edu-Front-3 |
Education is necessary, the Ontario Libertarian Party believes that individuals need to understand economic principles, the importance of freedom and individual rights and have the knowledge to be critical of what is provided to them from "official channels". There are few people in this province who will argue that all education needs to be paid for by every individual. The political climate is very clear: public spending on education will be with us for quite some time to come.
Given that, the shocking lack of choice to parents is completely unnecessary, and it has worked as an impediment to the level of Quality that all this public funding could provide in education. --Gjhagenaars 01:45, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Short-Term Goals
|
| Edu-Front-1 |
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
|
| Edu-Front-3 |
An introduction of a voucher system. This means that (public) money follows the student. Parents will be able to pick a school (public or private) and the voucher can be used by the school to use as the necessary funding to provide a quality education.
Private schools will (likely) have higher fees, so that parents will need to spend more money to get their children into an expensive private school. However, in locations where (non exclusive) private schools were introduced who didn't require a parental "top-up", some interesting things have happened.
- Private schools got incentives to prove that they were INDEED better than public schools.
- Public schools got incentives to prove that they were able to provide a quality education that was INDEED as good as (if not better) than a local private school.
This has happened in New Zealand. Standard testing showed that public schools took only 18 months to match the test results of private schools. Something that had not happened in the decades before the voucher system was introduced. --Gjhagenaars 01:51, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Long-Term Goals
|
| Edu-Front-1 |
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
|
| Edu-Front-3 |
The long-term "pure libertarian position" is that everyone pays for their own education. We're a long, long, long way off from that. I think we should ignore the long-term position and just go for what is going to be quite the uphill battle already. Let the voucher system be the official "long-term goal". Once we're there, we can talk about how to improve the situation further. --Gjhagenaars 01:54, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Hard Questions
|
| Edu-Front-1 |
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
1. Voucher system will kill all the public schools! Do you hate the poor?
On the contrary. Evidence shows that public schools become more results focused and match the quality of the private schools. The poor (who cannot afford to pay a "top-up" for a private school) get a better education system for their children just because there is competition. The poor are better off with this system. --Gjhagenaars 02:06, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
2. This does nothing for home schooling! Are you a real libertarian?
Home schooling costs significantly less than public (or private) schooling, and the quality of home schooling is fairly high most of the time. Successful home schooling could qualify for a reduction in taxes for the parents of those who home school. This would be closer to the libertarian ideal and still make sure that children end up with an understanding of individual rights, property rights, freedoms, economic understanding, reading, writing, etc. If the voucher system is in place longer, it should be easy to reduce the taxes of those who have ever home-schooled to be free from contributing to a system they don't believe in. --Gjhagenaars 02:06, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
3. I still have to pay for public education funding? Are you a real libertarian?
It has taken over 100 years to get to this point, we're not going to go anywhere by arguing for a return to an 18th century education system. We can improve the current situation. Once we are there, we can see how we improve the situation further. --Gjhagenaars 02:06, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Policy Impacts
|
| Edu-Front-1 |
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
The Department of Education would still have a large budget, and would still dole out significant amounts of money. The way that money is handled will be significantly different. Parents end up with a lot more say in how education works, but there will be a registration of children against schools they attend (and for how long). Schools will have to compete with each other for students, and they will be free to do so.
There are several ways in which the overall budget can be calculated. As long as public funding of education is in place, it is reasonable to see an increase in costs per pupil per year (because of the wage factor and items / equipment / real estate / furniture / etc getting more expensive because of inflation). The Ontario Libertarian Party could take a simple approach of counting the number of children that attend school (right now), and how much is spent per pupil, and to take that amount as the baseline. Increase the baseline every year by the inflation rate, and let the schools figure out for themselves how they make their budgets work out.
This will (already) be difficult enough to sell, given the other parties' tendency to just throw more billions at the education problem (which doesn't work).
If we start from this position, nobody can argue that (a) people who are in the education field will end up earning less (because it's not true) and (b) quality will go down (because it's not true). --Gjhagenaars 02:16, 12 June 2012 (EDT)
Explained Improvement
|
| Edu-Front-2 |
|
| Edu-Front-3 |
Summarizing Language
TWO adjectives, ONE noun
|
| Edu-Back-1 |
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
ONE Catchy Slogan
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
ONE One-sentence quote
|
| Edu-Back-1 |
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
ONE Three-sentence quote
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
TWO Charts/Graphs/InfoGraphics
|
| Edu-Back-1 |
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
High level bullet Summary
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
Short-term
- ...
- ...
- ...
Long-term
- ...
- ...
- ...
ONE economic concept
|
| Edu-Front-3 |
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
THREE photos
|
| Edu-Back-1 |
|
| Edu-Back-2 |
Guidance For Candidates
Writing to be used in training, and support of candidates. Not for publishing.
References
...citations are necessary